<?xml version='1.0' encoding='iso-8859-1'?><?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://w3future.com/w3f/w3f.xsl' ?>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2" xmlns:ev="http://www.w3.org/2001/xml-events" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" xmlns:xf="http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms/cr" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/index.txt">
<head>
<title>Sjoerd Visscher's weblog</title>
</head>
<body>
<section id="content">
	<h>Sjoerd Visscher's weblog</h>
	<p></p>
	<section id="note">
		<h>Last Update</h>
		<p>10/16/2005; 1:21:50 AM</p>
		<p id="alternates" class="buttons">
			<l href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/index.xml?notransform" rel="alternate" type="application/xml" title="See this web page with XHTML 2.0 technology."><span>Try</span> XHTML 2.0</l>
			<l href="view-source:https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/index.xml?notransform" title="View the XHTML 2.0 source of this page."><span>Src</span> XHTML 2.0</l>
			<l href="https://w3future.com/tools/xr.pl?xr=https://w3future.com/xr/w3f.xml&amp;xml=https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/index.xml%3Fnotransform" rel="meta" type="application/rdf+xml" title="RDF metadata"><span>RDF</span> Metadata</l>
		</p>
		<xi:include href="https://w3future.com/w3f/buttons.xml" />
	</section><section>
  <h><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/30.xml">Tuesday, April 30, 2002</a></h>
<a name="a95"></a>
<section id="a95">
<h id='inreplytoHttpwwwtreedragoncomgedmaptinewapr02htm21apr02scraping'><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/30.xml#a95" class="weblogItemTitle">In-Reply-To: http://www.treedragon.com/ged/map/ti/newApr02.htm#21apr02-scraping</a></h>
<blockquote cite="http://www.treedragon.com/ged/map/ti/newApr02.htm#21apr02-scraping"><p>
Sjoerd Visscher wrote me to describe his recent scraping of my site.
Below I reprint parts of his email, which I expect Sjoerd won't mind.
(This is part of a drift in the direction of expecting public exchanges.) [...] If you don't mind, I could put a link to it here for other folks to use. [<a href="http://www.treedragon.com/ged/map/ti/newApr02.htm#21apr02-scraping">David McCusker</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>I don't mind. Already 20 people are downloading <a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/staplerFeeds/mccusker.xml">the feed</a> every day. There are probably plenty more people interested. The use of public weblogs instead of e-mail is interesting. But there's  a lot to be done before it's really going to work. The biggest problem that prevents building cool tools is that there's no way to get the post that goes with a permalink.</p>
</section><a name="a94"></a>
<section id="a94">
<h id='daveWinerAboutVerbsAndNouns'><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/30.xml#a94" class="weblogItemTitle">Dave Winer about verbs and nouns</a></h>
<p><a href="http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2002/04/29#lde6cd7c3b4ba8ac69448509c66036e87">Dave comments</a> about REST as a programming style. If there's something left of the AppleScript discussion online, I'd like to read it. I'm in the REST camp because I think it's less work. Reducing the number of verbs in <a href="http://www.xmlrpc.com/manilarpc">the Manila-RPC interface</a>, with the advancedPrefs API, was a big improvement IMHO.</p>
</section><a name="a93"></a>
<section id="a93">
<h id='restAsAProgrammingStyle'><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/30.xml#a93" class="weblogItemTitle">REST as a programming style</a></h>
<blockquote cite="http://radio.weblogs.com/0101679/2002/04/28.html"><p>I'm now convinced that one can architect a system in accordance to the principles of REST and then implement that system using RPC style, HTTP transport, POST binding, SOAP. [<a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0101679/2002/04/28.html">Sam Ruby</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>This really opened my eyes to look for what REST is really about. If I understand it correctly a RESTful RPC system has a small API. What really happens depends on the parameters, ideally some kind of (global) id. In most cases the API is something like: read, create, change and delete in one form or another. Translated to programming terms it is like having a huge set of global variables (the state of the program) which are read and written directly. Sounds like REST violates a lot of rules of both functional <i>and</i> object oriented programming.</p>
</section>
</section><section>
  <h><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/20.xml">Saturday, April 20, 2002</a></h>
<a name="a92"></a>
<section id="a92">
<h id='opmlWithRelatedPages'><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/20.xml#a92" class="weblogItemTitle">OPML with related pages</a></h>
<p>I wanted to try the new Google API. And reading that <a href="http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2002/04/20#l79318edbf1bd2e4ab7c903c3e59756e9">Dave Winer is having fun using his Google Outline Browser</a>, I thought I'd try that too in my <a href="https://w3future.com/html/opmlloader.xml#https://w3future.com/weblog/sidebars/opmlloader.opml">OPMLLoader</a>. It's a bit different from Dave's version. You can expand any link to a page and <a href="https://w3future.com/html/opmlloader.xml#rel=https://w3future.com/weblog">see the related pages</a>. Dave's right, it's really fun!</p>
</section>
</section><section>
  <h><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/19.xml">Friday, April 19, 2002</a></h>
<a name="a91"></a>
<section id="a91">
<h id='xmlrpcVsSoap'><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/19.xml#a91" class="weblogItemTitle">XML-RPC vs SOAP</a></h>
<p><a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0101679/2002/04/19.html#a377">Sam Ruby</a> is waiting for the light-bulb to go off. I think it's like this: SOAP is about XML, and XML-RPC is about scripting. When I want to call a function on my PHP server with a Javascript client, I don't want to be bothered with XML. I want the arguments to be native data structures, and the same goes for the return values. Both serverside and clientside. But when you're in a situation where you're already using XML and schemas etc., then SOAP is more powerful. Apis like Google's are used in both cases, so supporting both SOAP and XML-RPC would have been my choice.</p>
</section><a name="a90"></a>
<section id="a90">
<h id='someSmallThingsToBreakTheSilence'><a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/19.xml#a90" class="weblogItemTitle">Some small things to break the silence</a></h>
<ul>
<li>I'm scraping <a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/staplerFeeds/mccusker.xml">David McCusker's weblog</a> and <a href="https://w3future.com/weblog/staplerFeeds/glishcom.xml">Eric Costello's weblog</a>.</li>
<li>For OPML fans running Mozilla:<ol><li>Bookmark this link:<a href="https://w3future.com/html/opmlloader.xml#%s">https://w3future.com/html/opmlloader.xml#%s</a>.</li>
<li>Add the keyword "opml" to the properties of that bookmark.</li>
<li>Type "opml http://radio.weblogs.com/0001015/instantOutliner/daveWiner.opml" in the addressbar.</li></ol></li></ul>
</section>
</section>
<xi:include href="https://w3future.com/tools/rdf.php?about=https://w3future.com/weblog/2002/04/index.txt" /></section>
<section id="navigation"><xi:include href="https://w3future.com/w3f/sections.xml" /></section>
<section id="sidebar"><xi:include href="https://w3future.com/weblog/sidebars/weblog.opml" /></section>
</body>
</html>